Beyond Individual Expertise: How AI and Collaboration Are Reshaping Improvement Knowledge

In higher education, we've grown accustomed to conferences where brilliant insights emerge during hallway conversations—only to disappear the moment people head back to their respective institutions. What if we could capture those fleeting moments of collective wisdom and transform them into lasting organizational knowledge?

Word clouds generated

This question drove my recent presentation to the Lean Higher Education community, where I shared insights from the Future of People at Work (FPW) initiative's experiments with AI-enhanced conversation capture and collaborative learning.

The Knowledge Retention Challenge

Every improvement practitioner knows the frustration: you attend an engaging conference, participate in rich discussions, exchange business cards with promising contacts, and return to work energized. Yet within weeks, the specific insights fade, connections grow cold, and you're left with generic takeaways rather than actionable intelligence.

The FPW initiative is tackling this challenge by systematically capturing the knowledge that typically "slips through the cracks." During my Lean HE presentation, we demonstrated this approach in real-time—recording the session, analyzing chat interactions, and using interactive polling to surface collective insights that could be processed through AI for pattern recognition and synthesis.

What the Data Revealed

The results were illuminating. When we asked higher education lean practitioners about their biggest challenges, budget constraints emerged as the dominant concern, followed by workforce apathy, burnout, and accountability issues. But perhaps more interesting were the connections between these challenges and broader themes emerging from our cross-industry FPW conversations.

We've identified eight recurring "hot topics" that transcend individual organizations and methodologies:

1. The tension between "quick fixes" and patient cultural transformation—what one Toyota executive called the reality that "nobody wants to get rich slowly."

2. Generational integration challenges, with one participant memorably urging practitioners to "stop being old farts" when communicating across different workforce generations.

3. The leadership engagement paradox: Can middle management drive meaningful change without waiting for top-level support?

4. Project-based vs. daily practice approaches—"What did I improve today? What did I learn today? What did I teach today?"

5. The certification paradox—when specialized training creates "elite" improvement groups rather than democratizing problem-solving

6. Small organization challenges—adapting improvement approaches without dedicated resources

7. Technology integration—pulling tools based on need rather than pushing based on excitement

8. Sustainability struggles—moving beyond initial enthusiasm to lasting cultural change

These patterns suggest that individual institutions aren't alone in their struggles. More importantly, they point toward collaborative solutions that could be more effective than isolated institutional efforts.

The Power of Cross-Organizational Learning

The FPW initiative represents something unique in the improvement world: a genuine collaboration between seven leading organizations (Lean Enterprise Institute, Shingo Institute, GBMP, Catalysis, Toyota TSSC, OSU Center for Operational Excellence, and Central Coast Lean) focused on bridging methodological boundaries.

Rather than competing for attention or promoting specific approaches, these organizations are exploring how different improvement traditions can complement each other. The result is a richer understanding of workplace challenges that goes beyond any single methodology's perspective.

For higher education practitioners, this collaborative model offers particular value. Universities often operate in isolation, each believing their challenges are unique to their institutional context. The FPW approach reveals how common these challenges actually are—and how much we can learn from practitioners in healthcare, manufacturing, and other sectors facing similar obstacles.

Technology as Enabler, Not Replacement

One principle that emerged clearly from our discussions was the importance of "pulling tools based on need rather than pushing based on excitement." This is particularly relevant as institutions rush to implement AI solutions without clear purpose or strategy.

In our session, technology enhanced rather than replaced human interaction. The Mentimeter polls engaged participants who might hesitate to speak up in a large virtual meeting. The AI analysis will help us identify patterns across multiple conversations. The interactive format kept energy high in what could have been a passive listening experience.

But the technology served the human objectives—not the other way around. This "pull vs. push" principle offers a useful framework for any organization considering new tools or systems.

Building Sustainable Communities of Practice

Perhaps the most important insight from the FPW initiative is that sustainable improvement requires ongoing relationship-building, not just periodic events. The monthly virtual community meetings, upcoming symposium (June 26-27, 2025, in Salt Lake City), and blog series create multiple touchpoints for continued engagement.

This approach addresses what we might call the "conference problem"—the tendency for valuable connections and insights to dissipate after individual events. By creating multiple ways for people to stay engaged, the FPW community builds real relationships that can support ongoing collaborative learning.

Implications for Higher Education

For lean practitioners in higher education, the FPW model suggests several possibilities:

• Cross-institutional collaboration on common challenges rather than isolated problem-solving efforts

• AI-enhanced knowledge capture to retain insights from meetings, conferences, and collaborative sessions

• Technology integration strategies that enhance rather than replace human capabilities

• Sustained engagement models that build lasting relationships beyond individual events

The reduced symposium fee ($499) reflects a commitment to accessibility for educational institutions, recognizing that academic budgets often can't support high-priced corporate events.

Moving Forward Together

As improvement practitioners, we've long recognized that the best solutions emerge from diverse perspectives and collaborative problem-solving. The FPW initiative is putting this principle into practice at scale, using both human wisdom and artificial intelligence to capture and share knowledge across organizational and methodological boundaries.

For those of us in higher education facing budget constraints, workforce challenges, and competing priorities, this collaborative approach offers hope. We don't have to solve these problems alone—and we don't have to reinvent solutions that others have already discovered.

The question isn't whether individual institutions can overcome these challenges in isolation. The question is how much faster we can progress when we combine our collective intelligence with the tools to capture and share what we learn.

Join us at the Future of People at Work (FPW) Symposium, June 26-27, 2025, at OC Tanner's facility in Salt Lake City, where we'll explore these and other innovative approaches to improvement methods. Learn more at https://www.fpwork.org/

Connect with us:

• Follow the FPW LinkedIn page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/future-people-work/

• Register for monthly FPW conversations: https://forms.gle/yXPbCXURdfvYtjmn9

• Check out this FPW related event from our partner organizations: https://www.fpwork.org/fpw-events

This post was developed through collaboration between the authors and synthesized with Claude.AI assistance, demonstrating the potential of human-AI partnership in knowledge sharing while maintaining authenticity through author review and validation.